Lithuania vs Mozambique: Input — Cropland nitrogen

Lithuania
237,333 t
in 2023
Mozambique
229,262 t
in 2023
Lithuania rank
78th
Mozambique rank
81st

Input — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Lithuania
  • Mozambique
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 237,333 t against 229,262 t in Mozambique, a difference of 8,071 t.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 78th and Mozambique ranks 81st of 201 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Mozambique Difference Ahead
1990s 168,160 t 82,289 t 85,871 t Lithuania
2000s 184,198 t 117,913 t 66,285 t Lithuania
2010s 236,436 t 161,317 t 75,120 t Lithuania
2020s 248,420 t 203,881 t 44,539 t Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Lithuania or Mozambique?
Lithuania, at 237,333 t against 229,262 t in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Lithuania and Mozambique?
8,071 t, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Mozambique?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Mozambique rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
Lithuania ranks 78th and Mozambique ranks 81st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).