Luxembourg vs Puerto Rico: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Luxembourg
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 6,971 t against 5,997 t in Puerto Rico, a difference of 974 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.2 times Puerto Rico's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 162nd and Puerto Rico ranks 164th of 201 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,888 t | 8,778 t | 109.55 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 8,850 t | 8,298 t | 551.92 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 7,575 t | 6,742 t | 833.13 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Luxembourg or Puerto Rico?
- Luxembourg, at 6,971 t against 5,997 t in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Luxembourg and Puerto Rico?
- 974 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Puerto Rico?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Puerto Rico rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Luxembourg ranks 162nd and Puerto Rico ranks 164th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).