Madagascar vs Tajikistan: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Madagascar
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 148,630 t against 146,693 t in Madagascar, a difference of 1,937 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Madagascar ranks 103rd and Tajikistan ranks 101st of 201 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 96,368 t | 70,968 t | 25,400 t | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 93,302 t | 51,805 t | 41,497 t | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 117,742 t | 80,957 t | 36,785 t | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 135,448 t | 133,541 t | 1,908 t | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Madagascar or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 148,630 t against 146,693 t in Madagascar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Madagascar and Tajikistan?
- 1,937 t, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Madagascar and Tajikistan rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Madagascar ranks 103rd and Tajikistan ranks 101st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).