Malaysia vs Sudan: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Malaysia
- Sudan
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 558,110 t against 494,591 t in Sudan, a difference of 63,519 t.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 40th and Sudan ranks 42nd of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 660,576 t | 497,944 t | 162,633 t | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 547,656 t | 586,439 t | 38,783 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Malaysia or Sudan?
- Malaysia, at 558,110 t against 494,591 t in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Malaysia and Sudan?
- 63,519 t, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Malaysia and Sudan rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Malaysia ranks 40th and Sudan ranks 42nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).