Melanesia vs Panama: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Melanesia
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 60,615 t against 56,871 t in Melanesia, a difference of 3,744 t.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Melanesia's.
The two have swapped places 22 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.
Melanesia ranks 125th and Panama ranks 123rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Melanesia averaged higher in 3 and Panama in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Melanesia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14,168 t | 20,978 t | 6,810 t | Panama |
| 1970s | 23,817 t | 24,231 t | 414.61 t | Panama |
| 1980s | 31,730 t | 28,838 t | 2,893 t | Melanesia |
| 1990s | 36,579 t | 37,761 t | 1,181 t | Panama |
| 2000s | 40,370 t | 36,624 t | 3,746 t | Melanesia |
| 2010s | 50,635 t | 44,207 t | 6,428 t | Melanesia |
| 2020s | 57,409 t | 61,961 t | 4,552 t | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Melanesia or Panama?
- Panama, at 60,615 t against 56,871 t in Melanesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Melanesia and Panama?
- 3,744 t, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and Panama?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Melanesia and Panama rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Melanesia ranks 125th and Panama ranks 123rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).