Mexico vs Nigeria: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Mexico
- Nigeria
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 2.13 million t against 1.55 million t in Nigeria, a difference of 574,060 t.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.4 times Nigeria's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 18th and Nigeria ranks 21st of 201 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 572,683 t | 397,608 t | 175,075 t | Mexico |
| 1970s | 1.05 million t | 406,389 t | 643,304 t | Mexico |
| 1980s | 1.69 million t | 535,545 t | 1.15 million t | Mexico |
| 1990s | 1.71 million t | 814,092 t | 897,914 t | Mexico |
| 2000s | 1.66 million t | 993,422 t | 666,045 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 1.94 million t | 1.33 million t | 616,174 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 2.05 million t | 1.63 million t | 411,430 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Mexico or Nigeria?
- Mexico, at 2.13 million t against 1.55 million t in Nigeria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Mexico and Nigeria?
- 574,060 t, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Nigeria?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Nigeria rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Mexico ranks 18th and Nigeria ranks 21st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).