Middle Africa vs Uzbekistan: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Middle Africa
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 1.23 million t against 997,851 t in Middle Africa, a difference of 231,439 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.2 times Middle Africa's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Middle Africa ranks 28th and Uzbekistan ranks 27th of 32 groups.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle Africa | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 452,937 t | 760,425 t | 307,488 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 524,504 t | 731,181 t | 206,676 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 834,954 t | 958,443 t | 123,490 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 977,026 t | 1.18 million t | 200,552 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Middle Africa or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 1.23 million t against 997,851 t in Middle Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Middle Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 231,439 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Middle Africa and Uzbekistan rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Middle Africa ranks 28th and Uzbekistan ranks 27th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).