Montenegro vs Puerto Rico: Input — Cropland nitrogen

Montenegro
5,756 t
in 2023
Puerto Rico
5,997 t
in 2023
Montenegro rank
165th
Puerto Rico rank
164th

Input — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Montenegro
  • Puerto Rico
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 5,997 t against 5,756 t in Montenegro, a difference of 241 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.

Montenegro ranks 165th and Puerto Rico ranks 164th of 201 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montenegro Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
2000s 8,424 t 7,771 t 653.2 t Montenegro
2010s 6,756 t 8,298 t 1,543 t Puerto Rico
2020s 5,754 t 6,742 t 987.79 t Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Montenegro or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 5,997 t against 5,756 t in Montenegro as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Montenegro and Puerto Rico?
241 t, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Puerto Rico?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Montenegro and Puerto Rico rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
Montenegro ranks 165th and Puerto Rico ranks 164th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).