Panama vs Rwanda: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Panama
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 78,047 t against 60,615 t in Panama, a difference of 17,432 t.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.3 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 123rd and Rwanda ranks 120th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 20,978 t | 14,044 t | 6,934 t | Panama |
| 1970s | 24,231 t | 20,161 t | 4,070 t | Panama |
| 1980s | 28,838 t | 26,340 t | 2,497 t | Panama |
| 1990s | 37,761 t | 22,229 t | 15,532 t | Panama |
| 2000s | 36,624 t | 38,906 t | 2,282 t | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 44,207 t | 66,303 t | 22,096 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 61,961 t | 79,629 t | 17,668 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Panama or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 78,047 t against 60,615 t in Panama as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Panama and Rwanda?
- 17,432 t, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Panama and Rwanda rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Panama ranks 123rd and Rwanda ranks 120th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).