Paraguay vs Romania: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Paraguay
- Romania
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 876,448 t against 798,498 t in Romania, a difference of 77,950 t.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.
Paraguay ranks 32nd and Romania ranks 34th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 23,912 t | 648,226 t | 624,314 t | Romania |
| 1970s | 53,710 t | 1.15 million t | 1.09 million t | Romania |
| 1980s | 139,837 t | 1.51 million t | 1.37 million t | Romania |
| 1990s | 226,605 t | 773,950 t | 547,344 t | Romania |
| 2000s | 424,541 t | 599,658 t | 175,118 t | Romania |
| 2010s | 772,340 t | 764,042 t | 8,299 t | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 836,836 t | 859,330 t | 22,495 t | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Paraguay or Romania?
- Paraguay, at 876,448 t against 798,498 t in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Paraguay and Romania?
- 77,950 t, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Romania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Paraguay and Romania rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Paraguay ranks 32nd and Romania ranks 34th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).