Rwanda vs Switzerland: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Rwanda
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 89,249 t against 78,047 t in Rwanda, a difference of 11,202 t.
That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 120th and Switzerland ranks 118th of 201 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14,044 t | 85,991 t | 71,948 t | Switzerland |
| 1970s | 20,161 t | 105,492 t | 85,331 t | Switzerland |
| 1980s | 26,340 t | 119,680 t | 93,340 t | Switzerland |
| 1990s | 22,229 t | 107,944 t | 85,715 t | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 38,906 t | 94,542 t | 55,636 t | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 66,303 t | 90,674 t | 24,370 t | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 79,629 t | 89,733 t | 10,103 t | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Rwanda or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 89,249 t against 78,047 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Rwanda and Switzerland?
- 11,202 t, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Switzerland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and Switzerland rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Rwanda ranks 120th and Switzerland ranks 118th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).