Slovakia vs Zimbabwe: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Slovakia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 164,955 t against 163,344 t in Slovakia, a difference of 1,611 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Slovakia ranks 97th and Zimbabwe ranks 96th of 201 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovakia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 154,518 t | 137,984 t | 16,534 t | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 145,846 t | 104,748 t | 41,098 t | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 171,193 t | 115,820 t | 55,374 t | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 183,290 t | 161,962 t | 21,327 t | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, Slovakia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 164,955 t against 163,344 t in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between Slovakia and Zimbabwe?
- 1,611 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Zimbabwe?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Slovakia and Zimbabwe rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- Slovakia ranks 97th and Zimbabwe ranks 96th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).