South Sudan vs Tunisia: Input — Cropland nitrogen
Input — Cropland nitrogen over time
- South Sudan
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 110,430 t against 99,432 t in South Sudan, a difference of 10,998 t.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
South Sudan ranks 115th and Tunisia ranks 112th of 201 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 83,750 t | 132,766 t | 49,016 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 97,445 t | 126,174 t | 28,729 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland nitrogen, South Sudan or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 110,430 t against 99,432 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland nitrogen between South Sudan and Tunisia?
- 10,998 t, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Tunisia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and Tunisia rank globally for input — cropland nitrogen?
- South Sudan ranks 115th and Tunisia ranks 112th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).