Angola vs Chad: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Angola
- Chad
How they compare
Angola currently reports 3.37 kg/ha against 3.12 kg/ha in Chad, a difference of 0.25 kg/ha.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 168th and Chad ranks 169th of 201 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.7004 kg/ha | 0.6043 kg/ha | 0.0961 kg/ha | Angola |
| 1970s | 1.37 kg/ha | 0.742 kg/ha | 0.624 kg/ha | Angola |
| 1980s | 1.81 kg/ha | 0.7698 kg/ha | 1.04 kg/ha | Angola |
| 1990s | 1.68 kg/ha | 1.16 kg/ha | 0.5113 kg/ha | Angola |
| 2000s | 1.95 kg/ha | 1.6 kg/ha | 0.3454 kg/ha | Angola |
| 2010s | 3.12 kg/ha | 2.1 kg/ha | 1.02 kg/ha | Angola |
| 2020s | 3.43 kg/ha | 2.84 kg/ha | 0.589 kg/ha | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Angola or Chad?
- Angola, at 3.37 kg/ha against 3.12 kg/ha in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Angola and Chad?
- 0.25 kg/ha, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Chad?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Chad rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Angola ranks 168th and Chad ranks 169th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).