Angola vs Togo: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Angola
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 3.52 kg/ha against 3.37 kg/ha in Angola, a difference of 0.15 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 168th and Togo ranks 166th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 6 and Togo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.7004 kg/ha | 0.5597 kg/ha | 0.1407 kg/ha | Angola |
| 1970s | 1.37 kg/ha | 0.7373 kg/ha | 0.6287 kg/ha | Angola |
| 1980s | 1.81 kg/ha | 1.18 kg/ha | 0.6241 kg/ha | Angola |
| 1990s | 1.68 kg/ha | 1.71 kg/ha | 0.0359 kg/ha | Togo |
| 2000s | 1.95 kg/ha | 1.39 kg/ha | 0.5544 kg/ha | Angola |
| 2010s | 3.12 kg/ha | 2.25 kg/ha | 0.8641 kg/ha | Angola |
| 2020s | 3.43 kg/ha | 2.65 kg/ha | 0.7826 kg/ha | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Angola or Togo?
- Togo, at 3.52 kg/ha against 3.37 kg/ha in Angola as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Angola and Togo?
- 0.15 kg/ha, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Togo?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Togo rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Angola ranks 168th and Togo ranks 166th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).