Azerbaijan vs Papua New Guinea: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Azerbaijan
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 6.24 kg/ha against 6.15 kg/ha in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.09 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 146th and Papua New Guinea ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.19 kg/ha | 6.59 kg/ha | 3.39 kg/ha | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 2.04 kg/ha | 6.67 kg/ha | 4.63 kg/ha | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 4.46 kg/ha | 6.1 kg/ha | 1.64 kg/ha | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 6.69 kg/ha | 6.32 kg/ha | 0.3662 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Azerbaijan or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 6.24 kg/ha against 6.15 kg/ha in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Azerbaijan and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.09 kg/ha, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Papua New Guinea?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Papua New Guinea rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Azerbaijan ranks 146th and Papua New Guinea ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).