Belarus vs Iceland: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Belarus
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 16.65 kg/ha against 16.42 kg/ha in Belarus, a difference of 0.23 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 63rd and Iceland ranks 60th of 201 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16.36 kg/ha | 22.61 kg/ha | 6.25 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 2000s | 16.71 kg/ha | 22.27 kg/ha | 5.57 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 2010s | 19.65 kg/ha | 27.26 kg/ha | 7.61 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 2020s | 15.66 kg/ha | 21.21 kg/ha | 5.55 kg/ha | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Belarus or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 16.65 kg/ha against 16.42 kg/ha in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Belarus and Iceland?
- 0.23 kg/ha, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Iceland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Iceland rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Belarus ranks 63rd and Iceland ranks 60th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).