Botswana vs Morocco: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Botswana
- Morocco
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 7.04 kg/ha against 6.9 kg/ha in Botswana, a difference of 0.14 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Morocco has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 137th and Morocco ranks 136th of 201 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.27 kg/ha | 1.96 kg/ha | 0.6876 kg/ha | Morocco |
| 1970s | 2.45 kg/ha | 3.42 kg/ha | 0.9703 kg/ha | Morocco |
| 1980s | 2.33 kg/ha | 5.3 kg/ha | 2.96 kg/ha | Morocco |
| 1990s | 2.33 kg/ha | 4.69 kg/ha | 2.36 kg/ha | Morocco |
| 2000s | 3.39 kg/ha | 6.18 kg/ha | 2.79 kg/ha | Morocco |
| 2010s | 3.22 kg/ha | 8.87 kg/ha | 5.65 kg/ha | Morocco |
| 2020s | 4.82 kg/ha | 6.76 kg/ha | 1.94 kg/ha | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Botswana or Morocco?
- Morocco, at 7.04 kg/ha against 6.9 kg/ha in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Botswana and Morocco?
- 0.14 kg/ha, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Morocco?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Morocco rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Botswana ranks 137th and Morocco ranks 136th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).