Cambodia vs Kenya: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Cambodia
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 8.52 kg/ha against 8.18 kg/ha in Cambodia, a difference of 0.34 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 128th and Kenya ranks 125th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 2 and Kenya in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.8 kg/ha | 2.41 kg/ha | 1.39 kg/ha | Cambodia |
| 1970s | 5.04 kg/ha | 3.61 kg/ha | 1.43 kg/ha | Cambodia |
| 1980s | 4.21 kg/ha | 5.09 kg/ha | 0.8826 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 1990s | 4.57 kg/ha | 6.13 kg/ha | 1.56 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 2000s | 7.18 kg/ha | 7.66 kg/ha | 0.4743 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 2010s | 7.52 kg/ha | 9.21 kg/ha | 1.69 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 2020s | 8.54 kg/ha | 9.68 kg/ha | 1.15 kg/ha | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Cambodia or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 8.52 kg/ha against 8.18 kg/ha in Cambodia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Cambodia and Kenya?
- 0.34 kg/ha, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Kenya?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Kenya rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Cambodia ranks 128th and Kenya ranks 125th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).