Cameroon vs Ethiopia PDR: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Cameroon
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 2.18 kg/ha against 2.07 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 0.11 kg/ha.
That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia PDR's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cameroon ahead.
Cameroon ranks 185th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 186th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 3 and Ethiopia PDR in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.416 kg/ha | 0.3202 kg/ha | 0.0958 kg/ha | Cameroon |
| 1970s | 0.838 kg/ha | 0.5759 kg/ha | 0.2621 kg/ha | Cameroon |
| 1980s | 1.31 kg/ha | 1.09 kg/ha | 0.2157 kg/ha | Cameroon |
| 1990s | 1.12 kg/ha | 1.66 kg/ha | 0.5404 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Cameroon or Ethiopia PDR?
- Cameroon, at 2.18 kg/ha against 2.07 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Cameroon and Ethiopia PDR?
- 0.11 kg/ha, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Cameroon and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Cameroon ranks 185th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 186th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).