Canada vs Türkiye: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Canada
- Türkiye
How they compare
Canada currently reports 13.89 kg/ha against 13.83 kg/ha in Türkiye, a difference of 0.06 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 75th and Türkiye ranks 76th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Türkiye in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.79 kg/ha | 2.21 kg/ha | 2.58 kg/ha | Canada |
| 1970s | 6.63 kg/ha | 6.74 kg/ha | 0.1041 kg/ha | Türkiye |
| 1980s | 7.93 kg/ha | 9.41 kg/ha | 1.48 kg/ha | Türkiye |
| 1990s | 7.86 kg/ha | 10.79 kg/ha | 2.93 kg/ha | Türkiye |
| 2000s | 8.27 kg/ha | 9.96 kg/ha | 1.69 kg/ha | Türkiye |
| 2010s | 11.64 kg/ha | 12.27 kg/ha | 0.6292 kg/ha | Türkiye |
| 2020s | 13.32 kg/ha | 13.46 kg/ha | 0.1416 kg/ha | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Canada or Türkiye?
- Canada, at 13.89 kg/ha against 13.83 kg/ha in Türkiye as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Canada and Türkiye?
- 0.06 kg/ha, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Türkiye?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Türkiye rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Canada ranks 75th and Türkiye ranks 76th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).