Chad vs Uganda: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Chad
- Uganda
How they compare
Chad currently reports 3.12 kg/ha against 3.04 kg/ha in Uganda, a difference of 0.08 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.
Chad ranks 169th and Uganda ranks 172nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 5 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.6043 kg/ha | 0.531 kg/ha | 0.0733 kg/ha | Chad |
| 1970s | 0.742 kg/ha | 0.5952 kg/ha | 0.1468 kg/ha | Chad |
| 1980s | 0.7698 kg/ha | 0.5597 kg/ha | 0.2102 kg/ha | Chad |
| 1990s | 1.16 kg/ha | 1.16 kg/ha | 0.0007 kg/ha | Chad |
| 2000s | 1.6 kg/ha | 1.59 kg/ha | 0.0099 kg/ha | Chad |
| 2010s | 2.1 kg/ha | 2.29 kg/ha | 0.1887 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 2020s | 2.84 kg/ha | 2.98 kg/ha | 0.1358 kg/ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Chad or Uganda?
- Chad, at 3.12 kg/ha against 3.04 kg/ha in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Chad and Uganda?
- 0.08 kg/ha, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Uganda rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Chad ranks 169th and Uganda ranks 172nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).