Colombia vs Malta: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Colombia
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 32.05 kg/ha against 31.52 kg/ha in Colombia, a difference of 0.53 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.
Colombia ranks 31st and Malta ranks 30th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.61 kg/ha | 16.13 kg/ha | 7.52 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1970s | 10.92 kg/ha | 24.33 kg/ha | 13.41 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1980s | 14.06 kg/ha | 40.84 kg/ha | 26.78 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1990s | 21.35 kg/ha | 53.22 kg/ha | 31.86 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2000s | 33.57 kg/ha | 61.23 kg/ha | 27.66 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2010s | 40.85 kg/ha | 37.89 kg/ha | 2.96 kg/ha | Colombia |
| 2020s | 31.97 kg/ha | 41.56 kg/ha | 9.59 kg/ha | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Colombia or Malta?
- Malta, at 32.05 kg/ha against 31.52 kg/ha in Colombia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Colombia and Malta?
- 0.53 kg/ha, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Malta rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Colombia ranks 31st and Malta ranks 30th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).