Congo vs Eritrea: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Congo
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 1.61 kg/ha against 1.49 kg/ha in Congo, a difference of 0.12 kg/ha.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 193rd and Eritrea ranks 191st of 201 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.27 kg/ha | 2.75 kg/ha | 1.48 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0.9095 kg/ha | 2.41 kg/ha | 1.5 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0.9773 kg/ha | 1.65 kg/ha | 0.6687 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 1.41 kg/ha | 1.61 kg/ha | 0.1916 kg/ha | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Congo or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 1.61 kg/ha against 1.49 kg/ha in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Congo and Eritrea?
- 0.12 kg/ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Eritrea rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Congo ranks 193rd and Eritrea ranks 191st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).