Congo vs Lesotho: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Congo
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 1.81 kg/ha against 1.49 kg/ha in Congo, a difference of 0.32 kg/ha.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 193rd and Lesotho ranks 190th of 201 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3124 kg/ha | 1.86 kg/ha | 1.55 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 1970s | 0.4475 kg/ha | 3.74 kg/ha | 3.29 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 1980s | 0.5099 kg/ha | 7.25 kg/ha | 6.74 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 1990s | 1.16 kg/ha | 5.38 kg/ha | 4.22 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 0.9095 kg/ha | 3.9 kg/ha | 2.99 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 0.9773 kg/ha | 2.52 kg/ha | 1.54 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 1.41 kg/ha | 2 kg/ha | 0.5842 kg/ha | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Congo or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 1.81 kg/ha against 1.49 kg/ha in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Congo and Lesotho?
- 0.32 kg/ha, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Lesotho?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Lesotho rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Congo ranks 193rd and Lesotho ranks 190th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).