Cook Islands vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area

Cook Islands
35.88 kg/ha
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
6.06 kg/ha
in 2023
Cook Islands rank
23rd
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
24th

Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time

  • Cook Islands
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Cook Islands currently reports 35.88 kg/ha against 6.06 kg/ha in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 29.82 kg/ha.

That makes Cook Islands's figure about 5.9 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Cook Islands has been ahead every year.

Cook Islands ranks 23rd and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 24th of 186 countries.

Cook Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cook Islands Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 6.34 kg/ha 2.24 kg/ha 4.1 kg/ha Cook Islands
1970s 7.38 kg/ha 3.67 kg/ha 3.71 kg/ha Cook Islands
1980s 9.5 kg/ha 5.12 kg/ha 4.37 kg/ha Cook Islands
1990s 19.21 kg/ha 3.99 kg/ha 15.22 kg/ha Cook Islands
2000s 35.88 kg/ha 3.66 kg/ha 32.23 kg/ha Cook Islands
2010s 49.05 kg/ha 4.72 kg/ha 44.33 kg/ha Cook Islands
2020s 38.14 kg/ha 5.93 kg/ha 32.21 kg/ha Cook Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Cook Islands or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Cook Islands, at 35.88 kg/ha against 6.06 kg/ha in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Cook Islands and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
29.82 kg/ha, with Cook Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cook Islands and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
Cook Islands ranks 23rd and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 24th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cook Islands vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-phosphorus-per-unit-area/cook-islands/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-phosphorus-per-unit-area/cook-islands/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Cook Islands vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).