Cuba vs Dominica: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Dominica
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 3.53 kg/ha against 3.44 kg/ha in Cuba, a difference of 0.09 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominica ahead.
Cuba ranks 167th and Dominica ranks 164th of 201 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Dominica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 23.24 kg/ha | 37.11 kg/ha | 13.88 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 1970s | 12.21 kg/ha | 33.39 kg/ha | 21.19 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 1980s | 13.2 kg/ha | 25.67 kg/ha | 12.47 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 1990s | 6.73 kg/ha | 34.64 kg/ha | 27.91 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 2000s | 4.46 kg/ha | 13.3 kg/ha | 8.84 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 2010s | 5.49 kg/ha | 7.87 kg/ha | 2.38 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 2020s | 3.09 kg/ha | 5.65 kg/ha | 2.56 kg/ha | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Cuba or Dominica?
- Dominica, at 3.53 kg/ha against 3.44 kg/ha in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Cuba and Dominica?
- 0.09 kg/ha, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Dominica?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Dominica rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 167th and Dominica ranks 164th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).