Cyprus vs Guyana: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Cyprus
- Guyana
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 25.99 kg/ha against 25.21 kg/ha in Cyprus, a difference of 0.78 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guyana ahead.
Cyprus ranks 39th and Guyana ranks 36th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 5 and Guyana in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.65 kg/ha | 12.75 kg/ha | 3.1 kg/ha | Guyana |
| 1970s | 17.51 kg/ha | 20.13 kg/ha | 2.62 kg/ha | Guyana |
| 1980s | 24.34 kg/ha | 16.99 kg/ha | 7.35 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 1990s | 36.69 kg/ha | 9.9 kg/ha | 26.78 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2000s | 27.72 kg/ha | 16.93 kg/ha | 10.79 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 29.61 kg/ha | 27.81 kg/ha | 1.8 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 27.16 kg/ha | 25.62 kg/ha | 1.54 kg/ha | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Cyprus or Guyana?
- Guyana, at 25.99 kg/ha against 25.21 kg/ha in Cyprus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Cyprus and Guyana?
- 0.78 kg/ha, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Guyana?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Guyana rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Cyprus ranks 39th and Guyana ranks 36th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).