Czechia vs Ecuador: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Czechia
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 13.47 kg/ha against 12.99 kg/ha in Czechia, a difference of 0.48 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 81st and Ecuador ranks 80th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16.08 kg/ha | 10.56 kg/ha | 5.52 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2000s | 15.65 kg/ha | 13.44 kg/ha | 2.21 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | 15.4 kg/ha | 15.73 kg/ha | 0.3301 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 13.35 kg/ha | 15.3 kg/ha | 1.95 kg/ha | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Czechia or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 13.47 kg/ha against 12.99 kg/ha in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Czechia and Ecuador?
- 0.48 kg/ha, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Ecuador?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Ecuador rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Czechia ranks 81st and Ecuador ranks 80th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).