Eritrea vs Sierra Leone: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 1.61 kg/ha against 1.41 kg/ha in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.2 kg/ha.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Eritrea ranks 191st and Sierra Leone ranks 194th of 201 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.75 kg/ha | 1.73 kg/ha | 1.02 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 2.41 kg/ha | 0.631 kg/ha | 1.78 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 1.65 kg/ha | 0.9765 kg/ha | 0.6695 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 1.61 kg/ha | 1.42 kg/ha | 0.1818 kg/ha | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Eritrea or Sierra Leone?
- Eritrea, at 1.61 kg/ha against 1.41 kg/ha in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Eritrea and Sierra Leone?
- 0.2 kg/ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Sierra Leone?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Sierra Leone rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 191st and Sierra Leone ranks 194th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).