Eritrea vs Sudan (former): Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 1.61 kg/ha against 1.51 kg/ha in Sudan (former), a difference of 0.1 kg/ha.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Sudan (former)'s.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 191st and Sudan (former) ranks 192nd of 201 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.75 kg/ha | 0.5718 kg/ha | 2.18 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 2.41 kg/ha | 0.6064 kg/ha | 1.81 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 1.87 kg/ha | 1.52 kg/ha | 0.3494 kg/ha | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Eritrea or Sudan (former)?
- Eritrea, at 1.61 kg/ha against 1.51 kg/ha in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Eritrea and Sudan (former)?
- 0.1 kg/ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Sudan (former)?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Sudan (former) rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 191st and Sudan (former) ranks 192nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).