Estonia vs Saudi Arabia: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Estonia
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 9.91 kg/ha against 9.84 kg/ha in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.07 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Estonia ranks 110th and Saudi Arabia ranks 111th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.55 kg/ha | 17.98 kg/ha | 8.43 kg/ha | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 10.47 kg/ha | 15.11 kg/ha | 4.64 kg/ha | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 11.87 kg/ha | 12.14 kg/ha | 0.276 kg/ha | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 12.19 kg/ha | 10.5 kg/ha | 1.69 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Estonia or Saudi Arabia?
- Estonia, at 9.91 kg/ha against 9.84 kg/ha in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Estonia and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.07 kg/ha, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Saudi Arabia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 110th and Saudi Arabia ranks 111th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).