Eswatini vs Kyrgyzstan: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Eswatini
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 11.22 kg/ha against 10.62 kg/ha in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.6 kg/ha.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Eswatini ranks 97th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 99th of 201 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.7 kg/ha | 5.66 kg/ha | 1.03 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 7.15 kg/ha | 5.78 kg/ha | 1.37 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 9.13 kg/ha | 8.49 kg/ha | 0.6354 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 11.22 kg/ha | 10.77 kg/ha | 0.4528 kg/ha | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Eswatini or Kyrgyzstan?
- Eswatini, at 11.22 kg/ha against 10.62 kg/ha in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Eswatini and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.6 kg/ha, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Eswatini ranks 97th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 99th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).