Ethiopia vs Nicaragua: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Ethiopia
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 8.13 kg/ha against 8 kg/ha in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.13 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 132nd and Nicaragua ranks 130th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.38 kg/ha | 4.2 kg/ha | 0.1758 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 4.06 kg/ha | 5.66 kg/ha | 1.6 kg/ha | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 5.82 kg/ha | 8.4 kg/ha | 2.58 kg/ha | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 7.68 kg/ha | 9.17 kg/ha | 1.48 kg/ha | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Ethiopia or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 8.13 kg/ha against 8 kg/ha in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Ethiopia and Nicaragua?
- 0.13 kg/ha, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Nicaragua?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Nicaragua rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Ethiopia ranks 132nd and Nicaragua ranks 130th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).