Georgia vs South Africa: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Georgia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 9.4 kg/ha against 9.23 kg/ha in Georgia, a difference of 0.17 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was South Africa ahead.
Georgia ranks 115th and South Africa ranks 113th of 186 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.61 kg/ha | 7.74 kg/ha | 3.13 kg/ha | South Africa |
| 2000s | 4.08 kg/ha | 6.62 kg/ha | 2.54 kg/ha | South Africa |
| 2010s | 6.79 kg/ha | 8.89 kg/ha | 2.09 kg/ha | South Africa |
| 2020s | 8.98 kg/ha | 10.54 kg/ha | 1.56 kg/ha | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Georgia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 9.4 kg/ha against 9.23 kg/ha in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Georgia and South Africa?
- 0.17 kg/ha, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and South Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and South Africa rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 115th and South Africa ranks 113th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).