Guatemala vs Lebanon: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Guatemala
- Lebanon
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 13.67 kg/ha against 13.57 kg/ha in Lebanon, a difference of 0.1 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lebanon ahead.
Guatemala ranks 77th and Lebanon ranks 78th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Lebanon in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.14 kg/ha | 11.85 kg/ha | 6.71 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 1970s | 7.88 kg/ha | 20.19 kg/ha | 12.31 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 1980s | 8.78 kg/ha | 17.59 kg/ha | 8.81 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 1990s | 12.74 kg/ha | 33.02 kg/ha | 20.28 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 15.04 kg/ha | 28.14 kg/ha | 13.09 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 16.07 kg/ha | 25.58 kg/ha | 9.5 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 15.09 kg/ha | 14.32 kg/ha | 0.7746 kg/ha | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Guatemala or Lebanon?
- Guatemala, at 13.67 kg/ha against 13.57 kg/ha in Lebanon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Guatemala and Lebanon?
- 0.1 kg/ha, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Lebanon?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Lebanon rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Guatemala ranks 77th and Lebanon ranks 78th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).