Guinea vs Sudan: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area

Guinea
0.7502 kg/ha
in 2023
Sudan
1.07 kg/ha
in 2023
Guinea rank
198th
Sudan rank
196th

Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time

  • Guinea
  • Sudan
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 1.07 kg/ha against 0.7502 kg/ha in Guinea, a difference of 0.3198 kg/ha.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.4 times Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.

Guinea ranks 198th and Sudan ranks 196th of 201 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 0.8637 kg/ha 1.21 kg/ha 0.3419 kg/ha Sudan
2020s 1.09 kg/ha 1.17 kg/ha 0.0798 kg/ha Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Guinea or Sudan?
Sudan, at 1.07 kg/ha against 0.7502 kg/ha in Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Guinea and Sudan?
0.3198 kg/ha, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Guinea and Sudan rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
Guinea ranks 198th and Sudan ranks 196th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).