Indonesia vs Panama: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Indonesia
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 12.83 kg/ha against 12.73 kg/ha in Indonesia, a difference of 0.1 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.
Indonesia ranks 86th and Panama ranks 83rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 5 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.83 kg/ha | 4.18 kg/ha | 1.35 kg/ha | Panama |
| 1970s | 3.53 kg/ha | 7.06 kg/ha | 3.52 kg/ha | Panama |
| 1980s | 8.78 kg/ha | 7.33 kg/ha | 1.46 kg/ha | Indonesia |
| 1990s | 8.86 kg/ha | 8.55 kg/ha | 0.3101 kg/ha | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 7.17 kg/ha | 6.43 kg/ha | 0.7404 kg/ha | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 15.15 kg/ha | 11.3 kg/ha | 3.85 kg/ha | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 13.76 kg/ha | 12.69 kg/ha | 1.07 kg/ha | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Indonesia or Panama?
- Panama, at 12.83 kg/ha against 12.73 kg/ha in Indonesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Indonesia and Panama?
- 0.1 kg/ha, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Panama?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Indonesia and Panama rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Indonesia ranks 86th and Panama ranks 83rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).