Jordan vs Malawi: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Jordan
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 12.01 kg/ha against 11.68 kg/ha in Jordan, a difference of 0.33 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 93rd and Malawi ranks 90th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 6 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.94 kg/ha | 0.9857 kg/ha | 0.9507 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 1970s | 4.64 kg/ha | 1.37 kg/ha | 3.27 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 1980s | 8.1 kg/ha | 2.98 kg/ha | 5.11 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 1990s | 13.33 kg/ha | 3.31 kg/ha | 10.02 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 2000s | 11.92 kg/ha | 3.64 kg/ha | 8.28 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 2010s | 9.52 kg/ha | 6.27 kg/ha | 3.25 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 2020s | 9.69 kg/ha | 11.13 kg/ha | 1.45 kg/ha | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Jordan or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 12.01 kg/ha against 11.68 kg/ha in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Jordan and Malawi?
- 0.33 kg/ha, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Malawi?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Malawi rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Jordan ranks 93rd and Malawi ranks 90th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).