Kazakhstan vs Solomon Islands: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 2.05 kg/ha against 2.05 kg/ha in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 187th and Solomon Islands ranks 188th of 201 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.68 kg/ha | 2.83 kg/ha | 0.1497 kg/ha | Solomon Islands |
| 2000s | 1.53 kg/ha | 2.47 kg/ha | 0.9383 kg/ha | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 1.97 kg/ha | 3.03 kg/ha | 1.05 kg/ha | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 2.13 kg/ha | 2.13 kg/ha | 0.0016 kg/ha | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Kazakhstan or Solomon Islands?
- Kazakhstan, at 2.05 kg/ha against 2.05 kg/ha in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Kazakhstan and Solomon Islands?
- 0 kg/ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Solomon Islands?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Solomon Islands rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 187th and Solomon Islands ranks 188th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).