Kiribati vs Uganda: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Kiribati
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 3.04 kg/ha against 2.94 kg/ha in Kiribati, a difference of 0.1 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 174th and Uganda ranks 172nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 6 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.9577 kg/ha | 0.531 kg/ha | 0.4267 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 1970s | 1.1 kg/ha | 0.5952 kg/ha | 0.505 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 1980s | 1.19 kg/ha | 0.5597 kg/ha | 0.6345 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 1990s | 1.39 kg/ha | 1.16 kg/ha | 0.2289 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 2.26 kg/ha | 1.59 kg/ha | 0.6664 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 2.8 kg/ha | 2.29 kg/ha | 0.514 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 2.92 kg/ha | 2.98 kg/ha | 0.0559 kg/ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Kiribati or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 3.04 kg/ha against 2.94 kg/ha in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Kiribati and Uganda?
- 0.1 kg/ha, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Uganda rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Kiribati ranks 174th and Uganda ranks 172nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).