Kyrgyzstan vs Mauritius: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Mauritius
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 10.62 kg/ha against 10.14 kg/ha in Mauritius, a difference of 0.48 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Mauritius ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 95th and Mauritius ranks 98th of 186 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.66 kg/ha | 26.2 kg/ha | 20.53 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 5.78 kg/ha | 25.21 kg/ha | 19.44 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 8.49 kg/ha | 23.79 kg/ha | 15.29 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 10.77 kg/ha | 14.2 kg/ha | 3.43 kg/ha | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Kyrgyzstan or Mauritius?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 10.62 kg/ha against 10.14 kg/ha in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Kyrgyzstan and Mauritius?
- 0.48 kg/ha, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mauritius?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Mauritius rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 95th and Mauritius ranks 98th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).