Latvia vs Saint Lucia: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Latvia
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 12.81 kg/ha against 12.8 kg/ha in Latvia, a difference of 0.01 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 85th and Saint Lucia ranks 84th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Saint Lucia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.77 kg/ha | 6.41 kg/ha | 4.37 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2000s | 10.49 kg/ha | 16.45 kg/ha | 5.96 kg/ha | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 13.17 kg/ha | 14.31 kg/ha | 1.14 kg/ha | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 13.7 kg/ha | 12.76 kg/ha | 0.9395 kg/ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Latvia or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 12.81 kg/ha against 12.8 kg/ha in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Latvia and Saint Lucia?
- 0.01 kg/ha, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Saint Lucia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Saint Lucia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Latvia ranks 85th and Saint Lucia ranks 84th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).