Latvia vs Suriname: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Latvia
- Suriname
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 12.8 kg/ha against 12.44 kg/ha in Suriname, a difference of 0.36 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 85th and Suriname ranks 87th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.77 kg/ha | 7.73 kg/ha | 3.04 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2000s | 10.49 kg/ha | 14.99 kg/ha | 4.5 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2010s | 13.17 kg/ha | 14.7 kg/ha | 1.52 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2020s | 13.7 kg/ha | 13.42 kg/ha | 0.2797 kg/ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Latvia or Suriname?
- Latvia, at 12.8 kg/ha against 12.44 kg/ha in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Latvia and Suriname?
- 0.36 kg/ha, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Suriname?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Suriname rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Latvia ranks 85th and Suriname ranks 87th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).