Liberia vs Yemen: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Liberia
- Yemen
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 2.75 kg/ha against 2.65 kg/ha in Yemen, a difference of 0.1 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Liberia ahead.
Liberia ranks 176th and Yemen ranks 177th of 201 countries.
Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.8447 kg/ha | 0.6045 kg/ha | 0.2402 kg/ha | Liberia |
| 1970s | 1.41 kg/ha | 0.5896 kg/ha | 0.8157 kg/ha | Liberia |
| 1980s | 1.48 kg/ha | 0.9021 kg/ha | 0.5828 kg/ha | Liberia |
| 1990s | 1.38 kg/ha | 1.19 kg/ha | 0.1942 kg/ha | Liberia |
| 2000s | 1.66 kg/ha | 1.47 kg/ha | 0.1985 kg/ha | Liberia |
| 2010s | 2.75 kg/ha | 2.37 kg/ha | 0.3774 kg/ha | Liberia |
| 2020s | 2.91 kg/ha | 2.52 kg/ha | 0.3952 kg/ha | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Liberia or Yemen?
- Liberia, at 2.75 kg/ha against 2.65 kg/ha in Yemen as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Liberia and Yemen?
- 0.1 kg/ha, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Yemen?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Liberia and Yemen rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Liberia ranks 176th and Yemen ranks 177th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).