Malawi vs Suriname: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Malawi
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 12.44 kg/ha against 12.01 kg/ha in Malawi, a difference of 0.43 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 90th and Suriname ranks 87th of 201 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.9857 kg/ha | 8.34 kg/ha | 7.36 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 1970s | 1.37 kg/ha | 11.66 kg/ha | 10.29 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 1980s | 2.98 kg/ha | 13.3 kg/ha | 10.31 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 1990s | 3.31 kg/ha | 8.3 kg/ha | 5 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2000s | 3.64 kg/ha | 14.99 kg/ha | 11.35 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2010s | 6.27 kg/ha | 14.7 kg/ha | 8.43 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2020s | 11.13 kg/ha | 13.42 kg/ha | 2.28 kg/ha | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Malawi or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 12.44 kg/ha against 12.01 kg/ha in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Malawi and Suriname?
- 0.43 kg/ha, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Suriname rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Malawi ranks 90th and Suriname ranks 87th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).