Mali vs Mozambique: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Mali
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mali currently reports 2.3 kg/ha against 2.3 kg/ha in Mozambique, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 182nd and Mozambique ranks 183rd of 201 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.35 kg/ha | 0.673 kg/ha | 0.6801 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1970s | 1.95 kg/ha | 1.12 kg/ha | 0.8275 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1980s | 2.39 kg/ha | 1.72 kg/ha | 0.6742 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1990s | 2.33 kg/ha | 1.75 kg/ha | 0.577 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2000s | 2.13 kg/ha | 1.77 kg/ha | 0.3593 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2010s | 3 kg/ha | 1.6 kg/ha | 1.4 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2020s | 2.77 kg/ha | 2.1 kg/ha | 0.6699 kg/ha | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Mali or Mozambique?
- Mali, at 2.3 kg/ha against 2.3 kg/ha in Mozambique as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Mali and Mozambique?
- 0 kg/ha, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Mozambique?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mali and Mozambique rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Mali ranks 182nd and Mozambique ranks 183rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).