Mexico vs Suriname: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Mexico
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 12.44 kg/ha against 12.27 kg/ha in Mexico, a difference of 0.17 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.
Mexico ranks 89th and Suriname ranks 87th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.78 kg/ha | 8.34 kg/ha | 4.56 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 1970s | 7.62 kg/ha | 11.66 kg/ha | 4.03 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 1980s | 11.45 kg/ha | 13.3 kg/ha | 1.85 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 1990s | 8.34 kg/ha | 8.3 kg/ha | 0.0418 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 2000s | 8.45 kg/ha | 14.99 kg/ha | 6.55 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2010s | 10.64 kg/ha | 14.7 kg/ha | 4.05 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2020s | 11.59 kg/ha | 13.42 kg/ha | 1.83 kg/ha | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Mexico or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 12.44 kg/ha against 12.27 kg/ha in Mexico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Mexico and Suriname?
- 0.17 kg/ha, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Suriname rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Mexico ranks 89th and Suriname ranks 87th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).