Nauru vs Serbia: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area

Nauru
22.41 kg/ha
in 2023
Serbia
22.43 kg/ha
in 2023
Nauru rank
46th
Serbia rank
45th

Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time

  • Nauru
  • Serbia
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 22.43 kg/ha against 22.41 kg/ha in Nauru, a difference of 0.02 kg/ha.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Nauru ahead.

Nauru ranks 46th and Serbia ranks 45th of 201 countries.

Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 21.69 kg/ha 16.86 kg/ha 4.83 kg/ha Nauru
2010s 22.23 kg/ha 18.12 kg/ha 4.12 kg/ha Nauru
2020s 22.38 kg/ha 20.48 kg/ha 1.91 kg/ha Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Nauru or Serbia?
Serbia, at 22.43 kg/ha against 22.41 kg/ha in Nauru as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Nauru and Serbia?
0.02 kg/ha, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Nauru and Serbia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
Nauru ranks 46th and Serbia ranks 45th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).