North Macedonia vs Polynesia: Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- North Macedonia
- Polynesia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 8.82 kg/ha against 8.42 kg/ha in Polynesia, a difference of 0.4 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 124th and Polynesia ranks 126th of 201 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12.18 kg/ha | 11.69 kg/ha | 0.4919 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 13.85 kg/ha | 12.84 kg/ha | 1.02 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 12.45 kg/ha | 10.47 kg/ha | 1.98 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 9.63 kg/ha | 8.86 kg/ha | 0.7698 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus per unit area, North Macedonia or Polynesia?
- North Macedonia, at 8.82 kg/ha against 8.42 kg/ha in Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus per unit area between North Macedonia and Polynesia?
- 0.4 kg/ha, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Polynesia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do North Macedonia and Polynesia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- North Macedonia ranks 124th and Polynesia ranks 126th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).